A randomized controlled trial
Click here to access the full studyPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, UHN & Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto
Toronto General Hospital, UHN
Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto
Toronto General Hospital, UHN
Toronto General Hospital, UHN
Toronto General Hospital, UHN
Toronto General Hospital, UHN
The total number of exclusions displayed here is not equal to the actual total number of participants not meeting the inclusion criteria (displayed in the CONSORT diagram), as some participants had multiple reasons for exlcusion.
The average difference (95% credible intervals) in peak TcCO2 between groups was 0.0 mmHg (-1.3, 1.36).
The average difference (95% credible intervals) in mean TcCO2 between groups was -0.1 mmHg (-1.29, 1.1).
| Subgroup analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marginal posterior summaries of treatment effect when treatment is allowed to vary with stratification variables | ||||||
| Subgroup | Summary value | Peak TcCO2 | Treatment effect (95% CI) | Posterior probability | ||
| Face mask oxygen | High flow nasal oxygen | > 4 mmHg | < -4 mmHg | |||
| Baseline | N | 38 | 35 | |||
| mean (sd) | 49.0 mmHg (7.6) | 47.2 mmHg (6.3) | 0.7 mmHg (-1.11, 2.42) | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| CRT | N | 9 | 9 | |||
| mean (sd) | 49.3 mmHg ( 5.6) | 50.3 mmHg (16.1) | 0.2 mmHg (-3.56, 3.99) | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
| OSA | N | 14 | 12 | |||
| mean (sd) | 48.0 mmHg (6.6) | 45.0 mmHg (5.9) | -2.3 mmHg (-5.43, 0.84) | 0.00 | 0.14 | |
Data shown here are for who experienced an oxygen desaturation event (defined as SpO2 <90%). Hover over a line to highlight a particular sequence.
Data shown here are for who experienced an oxygen desaturation event (defined as SpO2 <90%). Hover over a line to highlight a particular sequence.
Routinely collected SpO2 data were extracted from the Drug Reconciliation and Electronic Monitoring system for this outcome. Missing values at the beginning of these trajectories reflect the time prior to commencement of procedures when patients are getting prepared.
The treatment effect (95% credible intervals) was 1.2 (0.62, 2.22).
The treatment effect (95% credible intervals) was 0.3 (0.15, 0.82).
The treatment effect (95% credible intervals) was 0.1 (0.05, 0.32).
The treatment effect (95% credible intervals) was 0.0 (-0.34, 0.23).